All posts
Published
June 23, 2025

Analyzing Indonesia’s Future Under Prabowo-Gibran Administration: What Lies Ahead?

Prabowo Subianto’s presidency is expected to maintain democratic stability with a firmer, more centralized leadership style. His government will likely emphasize Indonesia-first policies, increased international presence, and economic continuity with potential shifts based on cabinet composition. Speyside Asia Pacific analyzes the corporate affairs challenge in this high-growth market.

Prabowo Subianto’s presidency is expected to maintain democratic stability with a firmer, more centralized leadership style. His government will likely emphasize Indonesia-first policies, increased international presence, and economic continuity with potential shifts based on cabinet composition. Speyside Asia Pacific analyzes the corporate affairs challenge in this high-growth market.

The General Election Commission (KPU) has announced the victory of Prabowo Subianto-Gibran Rakabuming Raka as the elected President and Vice President on 20 March, 2024.  What does this mean for Indonesia moving forward?

In brief, under Prabowo’s leadership, Indonesia is likely to continue on its democratic path with stable governance but may adopt a more assertive approach. The former military general is known for his candor, with his governing style reflecting a more rigid and bureaucratic approach. This implies that, unlike Jokowi’s pragmatic, action-oriented style, Prabowo would likely heavily rely on his support team to drive strategic goals. Prabowo is also expected to continue Jokowi’s “Indonesia-first policies,” with a focus on garnering greater respect for Indonesia in the global community. Nevertheless, his extensive international exposure and experience in engaging with state leaders and the international community suggest that his presence on the international stage will likely be more prominent than that of the current administration.

In the economic sector, the campaign team has outlined 21 commodities for the expansion of the downstream agenda, including technology, and has prioritized establishing the National Revenue Institution to bolster Indonesia’s tax ratio. However, potential implications for business operations, such as increased restrictions and scrutiny, as well as the rising cost of doing business and other compliance costs, may arise if these policies are not carefully formulated and implemented. Nevertheless, while the emphasis on continuity from the previous administration is evident, the intricate web of factions vying for influence over economic policy suggests a nuanced approach ranging from nationalist-driven agendas to pro-business orientations. As such, instead of being influenced by a single faction, the composition of Prabowo’s economic team and cabinet appointments will likely encompass a mix of the spectrum, requiring extensive understanding of the key figures and their objectives to navigate Indonesian economic policies going forward.

So, who do you think will comprise the cabinet under Prabowo-Gibran? Share your thoughts with us!

#Indonesia #Indonesia2024 #PrabowoGibran #Politik #Ekonomi

Conclusion

Indonesia under Prabowo-Gibran will likely experience policy continuity in key areas but with stronger central control and strategic assertiveness. The cabinet's final makeup will be crucial in defining the balance between nationalist and pro-business influences, and businesses should closely monitor appointments to understand future regulatory and economic directions.

Recent News

View All News
Public Affairs

How Does Mining Regulation Work in the DRC?

Speyside Group provides an analytical assessment of the complex operating environment in sub-Saharan Africa by unpacking How Does Mining Regulation Work in the DRC. Last revised through major amendments in 2018, the DRC’s regulatory framework, governed by the Mining Code and Mining Regulations, seeks to balance mineral sovereignty with international investments. While the government has made notable efforts to improve compliance by aligning its policies with the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), the operational landscape remains heavily characterized by severe implementation gaps, infrastructure bottlenecks, and institutional capacity constraints. For global mining and energy investors, navigating the country's strategic cobalt, copper, and gold reserves requires a sophisticated approach to rising fiscal demands, strict local ownership requirements, and rapidly shifting geopolitical alliances.
Read post
Latin America

How do I get a product approved through ANVISA in Brazil without it taking five years?

Speyside Group provides a strategic perspective on accelerating market entry within Brazil's healthcare sector by analyzing how to optimize ANVISA Approval Times. A widespread perception among international life sciences firms is that navigating Brazil's national health regulator is a prohibitive, five-year endeavor. However, an operational analysis reveals that this timeline is rarely driven by the statutory framework itself, which mandates legal review deadlines of 120 days for priority cases and 365 days for ordinary ones. Instead, prolonged market access bottlenecks are primarily structural and behavioral, caused by mismatched dossier formatting, a failure to utilize optimized fast-track sub-categories, and falling into successive technical clarification cycles (fila de exigências). To counter these systemic delays, multinational corporations (MNCs) must pivot toward a sophisticated regulatory strategy built on regulatory reliance pathways, early alignment with optimized priority definitions, and precise tracking of ANVISA’s shifting technical parameters.
Read post
Social License To Operate

What is the difference between a legal permit and a social license for mining companies?

Speyside Group provides an analytical assessment of an increasingly critical barrier to capital deployment in the global extractive sector: The Difference Between a Legal Permit and a Social Licence. While a legal permit grants a mining enterprise the formal, statutory approval from local authorities to operate, it represents only one half of the execution equation. This briefing explores why a social licence to operate—defined as the complex political, economic, and social dynamics within local communities—is equally indispensable for long-term project delivery. Without a resilient framework for community alignment, operations face severe reputational and operational risks, where local stakeholders can effectively block projects through strikes, legal challenges, protests, and infrastructure disruption. To mitigate these cascading bottlenecks, international mining companies must shift from purely transactional compliance to active, culturally attuned stakeholder engagement.
Read post