All posts
Published
August 3, 2025

Mexico’s Pharma Decree: Opportunity or Obstacle for the Industry?

Mexico’s healthcare decree introduces new procurement risks. The Speyside Mexico team, specialized in healthcare, analyzes the corporate affairs challenge and market access implications.

Mexico’s healthcare decree introduces new procurement risks. The Speyside Mexico team, specialized in healthcare, analyzes the corporate affairs challenge and market access implications.

In a move that signals a strategic shift in Mexico’s industrial and health policy, the federal government has issued a new presidential decree aimed at strengthening the country’s pharmaceutical and medical devices sector. This introduces a set of measures designed to incentivize local production and research by leveraging public procurement. As Mexico seeks to position itself as a regional hub for biopharmaceutical innovation, this new policy framework outlines the government’s vision for reducing dependency on imports while encouraging investment and technological development within national borders.

On June 3, 2025, the Mexican government published a presidential decree aimed at strengthening the national pharmaceutical and medical devices industry.The measure introduces a new policy framework that leverages public procurement as a tool to promote local investment and production across the healthcare supply chain—including medicines, medical devices, and R&D activities. Starting in fiscal year 2026, consolidated public tenders will include an evaluation system that awards additional points to companies with manufacturing infrastructure or scientific research capabilities in Mexico.

The decree is aligned with the broader goals of Mexico’s 2025–2030 National Development Plan, which seeks to reduce import dependency, ensure universal access to medicines, and position the country as a regional hub for biopharmaceutical innovation. A new Inter-Ministerial Committee will also be created to review investment proposals and facilitate agreements with private-sector actors to enhance local capacity. In addition, the government has committed to strengthening COFEPRIS, the national regulatory agency, to streamline regulatory processes and accelerate market entry, ensuring alignment between industrial policy and health system efficiency.

Implications for the Industry:

The decree marks a significant shift in industrial policy. While it no longer mandates a manufacturing facility in Mexico as a prerequisite for participation, as initially considered, it still introduces preferential conditions that could act as non-tariff barriers. This adjustment followed engagement with industry representatives, who voiced strong concerns over the original policy’s feasibility. The government showed openness to dialogue and softened the implementation to focus on incentives rather than restrictions.

Nevertheless, several risks remain. Experts warn that favoring domestic operations through point-based evaluations may discourage participation from global innovators, particularly in biotech and advanced medical technologies, where local replication is neither technically nor economically viable. This could limit patient access to cutting-edge treatments and undermine Mexico’s competitiveness in the global health ecosystem

The new presidential decree represents a clear attempt by the Mexican government to integrate industrial policy with public health priorities. By offering incentives for local investment and strengthening regulatory infrastructure, the policy could drive long-term growth and innovation in the sector. However, its success will depend on balanced implementation, open dialogue with industry stakeholders, and careful consideration of potential unintended consequences—particularly regarding market access and international collaboration. As the 2026 implementation approaches, both public and private actors will be watching closely to see how the decree translates from policy into practice.

‍

Conclusion

The decree signals a strategic push to align health and industrial policy in Mexico. Its success will depend on maintaining collaboration with the private sector, ensuring fair access to innovation, and avoiding unintended barriers that could limit global partnerships or patient access to advanced treatments.

Recent News

View All News
APAC

Navigating Indonesia’s Shifting Political and Investment Landscape

Indonesia’s investment landscape is becoming more state-directed and politically dynamic. While sectors such as mining and energy face greater regulatory scrutiny, new areas of growth, from data centers to downstream industries, continue to attract investment. For businesses, understanding where power sits and building credible, long-term relationships is becoming increasingly important.
Read post
Public Affairs

How Should Governments and Investors Read the EU’s 2028–2034 Budget Negotiation?

Speyside Group provides an analytical assessment of the EU's 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework negotiation, examining the institutional redesign of EU spending priorities, the proposed National and Regional Partnership Plans, and the strategic competition for funding between cohesion, defense, and competitiveness objectives that will shape corporate access to EU capital through 2034.
Read post
Technology

EU AI Act: What Companies Need to Know for December 2026 and What’s Delayed

Speyside Group provides a practical explanation of what the EU AI Act will require from companies on December 2nd, 2026, following the postponement of the main high-risk obligations to 2027. While the delay gives businesses more time to prepare for the most demanding compliance requirements, it does not represent a broader pause to the AI Act. The December 2nd, 2026 milestone remains relevant, bringing the end of a specific transition period and two additional prohibited AI practices into scope.
Read post