All posts
Published
June 23, 2025

South Africa’s elections: Sunset on ANC’s majority brings a new era of coalition uncertainty

South Africa’s 2024 election forces the ANC into a coalition, as it drops below 50%, creating major political and economic uncertainty. Speyside Africa analyzes the corporate affairs challenge for this emerging market. Get the insight.

South Africa’s 2024 election forces the ANC into a coalition, as it drops below 50%, creating major political and economic uncertainty. Speyside Africa analyzes the corporate affairs challenge for this emerging market. Get the insight.

South Africa’s election results have begun to come in, and the results have confirmed that South Africa will be governed by a coalition, with highly significant implications for investors and business.  That the ANC fell under 50% of the vote is not a surprise.  The bigger shock is that with over 50% of the votes counted, the party is polling at 42.9%, falling short of the expectations that they would capture around 45% of the vote.

Given the scale of the party’s decline, they now likely face a far more complicated task in forming a government.  If the results hold, they will be unable to rely on support from one of the small parties that hold less than 5% of the vote.  That scenario would have allowed the ANC to govern without major concessions to a strong coalition partner.  If the ANC ends up with closer to 40% of the vote, as seems likely, we are left with a few plausible coalition partners, all of whom would have a price for their support and who would mean major changes to the landscape for foreign companies operating in South Africa.

The coalition options offer diverging paths for South Africa:

  • ANC/DA Coalition – The DA (23.4%) is open to free markets and economic liberalism.  They would likely push the ANC to reduce its statist economic tendencies and increase the role of the private sector in strategic economic sectors (including power and transport).  This scenario would be the most favourable for the private sector and foreign investors, but there is a little trust between the ANC and DA.  They have widely diverging policy views and the DA would likely extract a heavy price, including possibly demanding the deputy president’s position.  While there have been discussions, some ANC insiders feel this is the least likely coalition outcome, but it is also favoured by some ANC leaders
  • ANC/EFF Coalition – The EFF (9.5%) would support radical policies, including expropriation and nationalisation of strategic businesses.  Their participation in government would herald a significant deterioration of the business environment for foreign investment. The party is also supportive of strengthening relations with Russia, including developing nuclear power capacity with Russian support, bringing added risk for Western businesses.
  • ANC/MK Coalition – MK (10.2%), a party founded only last year by former president Jacob Zuma, has championed similar policies to the EFF, including nationalising land and banks.  They have also called for changes in South Africa’s political system, including a constitutional referendum and an unelected upper house.  MK has broken the ANC’s hold on KwaZulu-Natal by winning over ANC supporters, but a partnership would be hindered by the animosity between the parties’ leaders. While some ANC leaders are open to working with MK, a coalition might signal that the ANC is moving to oust President Ramaphosa.
  • ANC/Small Party Coalition – Until the elections, this was viewed as the most likely outcome, where the ANC was able to govern largely as normal, making minor concessions to gain the support of a small party.  Given their worse than expected performance, a small party coalition, if possible, would require the support of multiple parties, increasing the risk of instability. If the final count brings the ANC close to 50%, a coalition with small parties will be their preference, and is the option that will bring the least change.

As things stand, the outcome of the election means that companies face the uncertainty of diverging paths for South Africa’s policy environment, ranging from a more pro-market approach, to radical policies of nationalisation.  Another major question mark is now the future of President Ramaphosa.  While his certainly not all one would have hoped in terms of his ability stamp out corruption, implement necessary structural economic reforms and reinvigorate the government, he did provide welcome stability at the centre of power, but rumours from within the ANC suggest the poor result may cost him his leadership.

With any outcome, South Africa is set to have a national coalition government for the first time in living memory and the private sector will need to be vigilant, nimble and engaged to adapt to the new reality.

Conclusion

This marks a historic turning point for South Africa. The coalition’s final makeup—whether pro-market or radical—will shape the business environment, investor confidence, and the country’s global standing. While President Ramaphosa’s future is uncertain, what’s clear is that political fragmentation will demand greater agility from companies. The private sector must stay closely engaged with evolving policies and power dynamics to navigate the challenges and opportunities ahead.

Recent News

View All News
Latin America

How Do Elections Affect Business in Emerging Markets? Lessons from Latin America

Speyside Group provides a strategic perspective on how geopolitical risk shapes electoral outcomes and business operating environments across Latin America. Elections test whether governments can govern, not merely their ideological direction. Institutional capacity, legislative coalitions, and external pressures reshape the investment landscape more than electoral mandates alone, requiring investors to assess each country's capacity to implement policy.
Read post
APAC

Why Australia is No Longer a Two-Speed Economy

Speyside Group provides a strategic perspective on why the traditional Australian two-speed economy framing no longer describes the country adequately. Western Australia produced 45.4 per cent of national goods exports in 2025, but other important divisions cut across State and Territory lines: between metropolitan, regional and remote communities, and between established property owners, renters and prospective buyers. For investors and corporate affairs leaders, mapping the wrong divides produces the wrong engagement strategy
Read post
Latin America

Brazil Approves New Critical Minerals Policy

Speyside Group provides a strategic perspective on Brazil's critical minerals policy, approved by the Senate on September 2, 2026 and now awaiting presidential sanction. The framework creates a national governance council, a R$2 billion mineral activity guarantee fund, and up to R$5 billion in tax credits for domestic processing. For investors and multinationals, it raises expectations on local value addition, traceability, and regulatory engagement, and makes registry qualification the gateway to every incentive.
Read post