All posts
Published
June 23, 2025

The Illusion of Orbán’s Invincibility is Broken

The Speyside Central Eastern Europe team is analyzing a surprising shift: Hungary’s opposition won key local elections, including the Budapest mayoralty, breaking Fidesz’s decade-long dominance. Scandals, a weak campaign, and unified opposition helped drive the upset. This development underscores the need for sophisticated Corporate Affairs and government relations strategies to navigate the inevitable friction between the national government and new opposition-led municipalities.

The Speyside Central Eastern Europe team is analyzing a surprising shift: Hungary’s opposition won key local elections, including the Budapest mayoralty, breaking Fidesz’s decade-long dominance. Scandals, a weak campaign, and unified opposition helped drive the upset. This development underscores the need for sophisticated Corporate Affairs and government relations strategies to navigate the inevitable friction between the national government and new opposition-led municipalities.

On Sunday, local elections were held in Hungary, a country dominated by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz party since 2010 and widely considered to be a right-wing stronghold in Europe. The country watched in shock as Fidesz lost – or at least failed to win – an election for the first time in more than a decade.

The post of Budapest Mayor was won by Gergely Karácsony, a liberal, pro-European politician. Karácsony’s victory is as important as it was unexpected: polls measured a close race, but none took a bet on the loss of István Tarlós, Fidesz’s mayor who led Budapest for ten years.  And the tide didn’t stop at the City level – 14 of Budapest’s 23 districts were won by opposition parties, and of the 9 Budapest Fidesz districts, only 4 returned Mr. Orbán’s party a clear majority. We also witnessed a change country-wide, where Fidesz held only 13 of the 23 largest cities in Hungary.

The factors behind the opposition’s success are manifold. First and foremost, there are the sex scandals of Zsolt Borkai, the Fidesz Mayor of Győr, which dominated the tail-end of the campaign period. While Borkai himself was re-elected – largely as a result of the opposition candidate’s weakness – scandals about his private life and corruption hit the party’s wider campaign hard. Secondly, Fidesz’s campaign was surprisingly weak – it lacked a central message and a coordinated image; perhaps local Fidesz politicians were also misled by their own pollsters, complacent in the face of ten years’ success. Thirdly, the opposition finally managed to present their candidates as a united front, successfully preventing a division amongst voters.

The opposition’s victory is not yet a tragedy for Orbán, who still commands a two-thirds parliamentary majority and therefore a clear opportunity to weaken the financial and political stability of opposition-led cities. One possible scenario is an amendment to the Hungarian Constitution in which Fidesz transfers powers and money from the cities to the county assemblies in which – except for the Budapest Assembly – they managed to preserve their majority.  In any case, one thing we can be sure of is that Orbán will not soften his policies now – his authoritarian trend will continue, and we can expect to see persistent conflicts between his government and the now opposition-led municipalities.

(Recomended: Transition of power in Argentina)

Without a doubt, however, the significance of the damage inflicted to the illusion of Orbán’s invincibility cannot be overstated. Despite their differences, the opposition has learned to cooperate, and we may well see a tone in the local media, which commands an important role in Hungary. Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz prevails, but the result of the 2022 parliamentary elections is by no means the foregone conclusion it appeared to be this time last week.

Conclusion

Although Orbán still holds parliamentary power, these results weaken his image of invincibility. A more united opposition and growing local media influence could challenge Fidesz in future national elections.

Recent News

View All News
Public Affairs

How Does Mining Regulation Work in the DRC?

Speyside Group provides an analytical assessment of the complex operating environment in sub-Saharan Africa by unpacking How Does Mining Regulation Work in the DRC. Last revised through major amendments in 2018, the DRC’s regulatory framework, governed by the Mining Code and Mining Regulations, seeks to balance mineral sovereignty with international investments. While the government has made notable efforts to improve compliance by aligning its policies with the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), the operational landscape remains heavily characterized by severe implementation gaps, infrastructure bottlenecks, and institutional capacity constraints. For global mining and energy investors, navigating the country's strategic cobalt, copper, and gold reserves requires a sophisticated approach to rising fiscal demands, strict local ownership requirements, and rapidly shifting geopolitical alliances.
Read post
Latin America

How do I get a product approved through ANVISA in Brazil without it taking five years?

Speyside Group provides a strategic perspective on accelerating market entry within Brazil's healthcare sector by analyzing how to optimize ANVISA Approval Times. A widespread perception among international life sciences firms is that navigating Brazil's national health regulator is a prohibitive, five-year endeavor. However, an operational analysis reveals that this timeline is rarely driven by the statutory framework itself, which mandates legal review deadlines of 120 days for priority cases and 365 days for ordinary ones. Instead, prolonged market access bottlenecks are primarily structural and behavioral, caused by mismatched dossier formatting, a failure to utilize optimized fast-track sub-categories, and falling into successive technical clarification cycles (fila de exigências). To counter these systemic delays, multinational corporations (MNCs) must pivot toward a sophisticated regulatory strategy built on regulatory reliance pathways, early alignment with optimized priority definitions, and precise tracking of ANVISA’s shifting technical parameters.
Read post
Social License To Operate

What is the difference between a legal permit and a social license for mining companies?

Speyside Group provides an analytical assessment of an increasingly critical barrier to capital deployment in the global extractive sector: The Difference Between a Legal Permit and a Social Licence. While a legal permit grants a mining enterprise the formal, statutory approval from local authorities to operate, it represents only one half of the execution equation. This briefing explores why a social licence to operate—defined as the complex political, economic, and social dynamics within local communities—is equally indispensable for long-term project delivery. Without a resilient framework for community alignment, operations face severe reputational and operational risks, where local stakeholders can effectively block projects through strikes, legal challenges, protests, and infrastructure disruption. To mitigate these cascading bottlenecks, international mining companies must shift from purely transactional compliance to active, culturally attuned stakeholder engagement.
Read post